However, the price of Brent oil had recovered from the declines seen in and and it had stabilised at around 55 dollars per barrel. On the one hand, this recovery was a result of the agreement reached between OPEC and other large producers, such as Russia, in November to cut production. From June , however, oil prices began to increase sharply, driven by factors related to both supply and demand.
On the supply side, the first chart shows how the agreement reached between OPEC countries and their partners to cut production succeeded in containing, and even reducing, the global oil supply. What is more, the cuts in oil production have clearly exceeded those agreed, as shown in the second chart.
However, in the last few quarters, the US oil infrastructure has been constrained by bottlenecks and has not been able to offset the impact of the OPEC cuts. To add to the restriction of supply, on the demand side global economic growth surprised on the upside and led to a significant upward revision of growth forecasts. In fact, the third chart shows a very clear association between the increase in the price of oil and the improvement in the outlook for global GDP.
Finally, the combination of these dynamics of supply and demand led to a substantial depletion of the buffer in crude oil stocks, which would explain the increased volatility in the price of oil and its renewed sensitivity to geopolitical risks. Despite the fact that there is consensus on the role played by all of these factors, their relative importance is not clear and quantitative estimates on this matter vary considerably depending on the methodology used.
For example, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York breaks down oil price fluctuations into factors related to supply and demand, based on their relationship with a whole range of financial variables. A further oil spike would raise the already-elevated cost of living for Americans. And it would squeeze businesses grappling with sticker shock, shortages and supply chain disasters. Americans pay very close attention to prices at the pump and concerns about inflation have helped sour their views on the overall economy.
Nearly two-thirds of Americans described the economy as poor in a poll released this week. In Virginia, where Republicans won a key prize in the state's governor's mansion, the economy ranked in exit polls as the most important issue , surpassing education, taxes and Covid. Demand for energy is rising sharply. So why is Bank of America so bullish on oil?
First, it's because demand continues to recover swiftly from the pandemic, especially for gasoline as consumers drive more. Demand is getting a further boost from skyrocketing natural gas prices.
High natural gas prices will force some utilities and factories to switch to a relatively cheaper alternative: oil. Home heating prices are skyrocketing, and there's nothing Biden can do about it.
If oil gets too hot, consumers could balk at high prices and decide to drive less, or switch to more fuel efficient cars or electric vehicles. But Bank of America doesn't think that change will happen anywhere near the current price levels.
Indeed, as shown in Figure 6, energy consumption per dollar of GDP has gone down steadily over time. This means that energy prices matter less today than they did in the past. Blanchard and Gali suggest additional explanations. They find that increased flexibility in labor markets, monetary policy improvements, and a bit of good luck meaning the lack of concurrent adverse shocks have also contributed to the decline of the impact of oil shocks on the economy.
Finally, how monetary policymakers treated the economic shocks caused by rising oil prices also may have played a role in the impact of the shocks on economic growth and the inflation rate. Specifically, some have argued policymakers tended to worry more about output than inflation during the oil shocks of s and did not adequately take into account the inflationary aspect of the oil shocks when fashioning a policy response to them see, for example, Clarida, Gali, and Gertler In the case of the U.
By contrast, the Fed in the s is more committed to fighting inflation, the public knows it, and the result has been that, even though headline inflation has risen noticeably because of the direct effects of oil and commodity shocks, core inflation and inflation expectations remain contained. The lack of major output effects of oil price shocks since the s calls into question what role they played during the two recessions of that period.
In other words, one possible reason why oil shocks seem to have noticeably smaller effects on output now than they did in the s is that the world has changed. Another is that the effects of oil shocks were never as large as conventional wisdom hold, and that the slow growth of that decade had to do with other factors. Figure 6. Energy Consumption. Note that there are many possible ways to measure real oil prices, depending on which measure of inflation you use. To read more about supply and demand pressures on the world market for oil, consult the Short-Term Energy Outlook provided by the U.
Energy Information Administration. Trade does complicate matters here, because some of the U. Second, oil producers will use some of their income to buy goods from the U. Even so, there is a loss here, because they can buy more U. At the time this response was written, the NBER had not made an official pronouncement on whether the economy had entered a recession in early Blanchard, Olivier, and Jordi Gali. Brown, Stephen P. Fernald, John, and Bharat Trehan. Hooker, Mark. Asymmetric and Nonlinear Specifications versus Changes in Regime.
Krugman, Paul. Mankiw, Gregory. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Use precise geolocation data. Select personalised content. Create a personalised content profile. Measure ad performance. Select basic ads. Create a personalised ads profile. Select personalised ads. Apply market research to generate audience insights. Measure content performance.
Develop and improve products. List of Partners vendors. Researchers at the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland looked at movements in the price of oil and stock market prices and discovered, to the surprise of many, that there is little correlation between oil prices and the stock market.
Their study does not necessarily prove that the price of oil has a very limited impact on stock market prices; it does suggest, however, that analysts cannot really predict the way stocks react to changing oil prices.
It is popular to correlate changes in major factor prices, such as oil, and the performance of major stock market indexes. Conventional wisdom holds that an increase in oil prices will raise input costs for most businesses and force consumers to spend more money on gasoline, thereby reducing the corporate earnings of other businesses.
The opposite should be true when oil prices fall. He discovered his variables only occasionally moved in the same direction at the same time, but even then, the relationship was weak. Oil prices do have an impact on the U. High oil prices can drive job creation and investment as it becomes economically viable for oil companies to exploit higher-cost shale oil deposits. However, high oil prices also hit businesses and consumers with higher transportation and manufacturing costs.
Lower oil prices hurt the unconventional oil activity, but benefits manufacturing and other sectors where fuel costs are a primary concern. In the spring of , oil prices collapsed amid the economic slowdown. OPEC and its allies agreed to historic production cuts to stabilize prices, but they dropped to year lows.
The standard story is that the price of oil influences the costs of other production and manufacturing across the United States.
0コメント